翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Williams v Commonwealth
・ Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd
・ Williams v Hensman
・ Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd
・ Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
・ Williams v The Queen
・ Williams V-Jet II
・ Williams v. Florida
・ Williams v. Lee
・ Williams v. Mississippi
・ Williams v. North Carolina (1942)
・ Williams v. Price
・ Williams v. Pryor
・ Williams v. Rhodes
・ Williams v. Vidmar
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.
・ Williams Valley Railroad
・ Williams Valley School District
・ Williams Village
・ Williams W-17 Stinger
・ Williams Way, Gibraltar
・ Williams X-Jet
・ Williams' Blood
・ Williams' Conquest
・ Williams' Hospital
・ Williams' jerboa
・ Williams' mud turtle
・ Williams' p + 1 algorithm
・ Williams' Store
・ Williams' Taxonomy


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. : ウィキペディア英語版
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.

''Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.'', 350 F.2d 445 (C.A. D.C. 1965), was a court opinion, written by Judge J. Skelly Wright, that had a definitive discussion of unconscionability as a defense to enforcement of contracts in American contract law. As a staple of first-year law school contract law courses, it has been briefed extensively.〔Russell B. Korobkin, "A 'Traditional' and 'Behavioral' Law-and-Economics Analysis of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company," UCLA School of Law, Law & Econ. Research Paper No. 03-24 and University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 441, 2004, found at (SSRN papers web site ). Accessed March 27, 2008.〕〔(eTouch Briefs web site ). Accessed March 27, 2008.〕
It flows from interpretation of the Uniform Commercial Code § 2-302 (1954) and is relevant for the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 208.
==Facts==
The case involved Walker-Thomas (Washington, D.C. at 7th St. & L St. NW) extending credit from 1957 to 1962 to Williams for a series of furniture purchases. The contract was written in such a way that no furniture could be paid off until all of it was. When Williams defaulted on the contract in 1962, Walker-Thomas tried to repossess all the furniture sold since 1957. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that the lower court could rule the contract unconscionable and refuse to enforce it, and returned the case to the lower court to decide whether or not the contract was in fact unconscionable.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.